Reasons for willing John Duns Scotus' critical assessment of Aristotle's notion of rational and non-rational powers

Fecha
Director
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Brepols Publishers
Resumen
Descripción
In his Quaestiones super libros Methaphysicorum Aristotelis IX q.151, John Duns Scotus examines the difference between rational and non-rational potencies, proposed by Aristotle in Metaphysics IX 2. According to Aristotle, rational potencies are capable of producing opposite effects, while non-rational ones operate ad unum, i.e. directed to achieve one of the opposite effects. We propose that Scotus' intention was to determine the principle that makes the rationality or non-rationality of a potency, in order to find the foundation of actual contingency. In fact, rationality as a distinguishing attribute of potencies, and the subsequent affirmation of the intrinsic rationality of the will, allow Scotus to assert that actual contingency is a rational mode of organization of the real. The purpose of this paper is -based on an interpretation of the well-known Scotistic distinction between natural and free active principles- to show the place that Scotus ultimately gives to human action, whose foundation is the only rational potency in strict sense: the will. It is precisely in the analysis of this potency that we find the Scotistic thesis of synchronic contingency of the present, which opens a new perspective on the issue of human freedom and action.
Fil: Elías, Gloria Silvana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Unidad Ejecutora en Ciencias Sociales Regionales y Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Unidad Ejecutora en Ciencias Sociales Regionales y Humanidades; Argentina
Palabras claves
SCOTUS, WILLING, WILL, RATIONALITY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
Cita
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este ítem se publica bajo la siguiente licencia: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)